New Study: Republicans Historically Backed Science Funding More Than Thought
A new study challenges the notion that Republicans are anti-science. It finds that, from 1980 to 2020, the U.S. government provided more funding for science and research under Republican presidencies or when the party controlled the House of Representatives.
The research team analyzed 171 federal appropriations accounts across 27 agencies. On average, science and research-related funding was $150 million higher annually per year per account when Republicans controlled the House, and $100 million more when there was a Republican president.
This increased funding was not limited to specific agencies. Even the Department of Energy, which Democrats have traditionally prioritized for renewable energy, received more funding under Republican leadership. The partisan gap in science funding also grew more pronounced over time, with more money poured into research under Republican presidencies in 2001-2020 than in 1980-2000.
However, a shift occurred in the first half of 2025. The Trump administration and Republican-led Congress enacted or proposed budget cuts to key departments and institutions in science research.
Contrary to the popular narrative, Republicans have historically shown significant financial support for science and research. However, recent trends suggest a shift in this pattern. The study also notes that trust in scientists is higher among Democratic political elites than their Republican counterparts.
Read also:
- Medical professional advocates for increased action to address deficiency of primary care physicians
- Open Windows in Winter: Boost Health, Save Energy
- Treating hypertension can potentially add a decade to a person's life span.
- Mau Forest Women Preservers: Maintainers of Food Independence and Protectors of Sovereignty
